WHW-COMMISSION-2026-08-25-FAMILY-PRODUCTS · ready-to-commission
Commission the human review that AI cannot replace
Recommended order. Everyday Hero scenario adjudication first, Foxy early-years and language review second, and Primary Power generator validation third. An observed caregiver-child pilot follows only after expert content review closes critical defects.
Download the machine-readable brief · See the internal red/purple review
Independence and acceptance boundary
AI-assisted internal review prepared and prioritised this work, but it is not a substitute for the named human reviewers. Reviewers must disclose conflicts and review the supplied content hashes.
- Approval applies only to the exact reviewed content hash; a material content change invalidates it.
- A reviewer may cover more than one lens only where their qualifications genuinely cover each lens.
- Child or caregiver testing requires informed adult consent, age-appropriate assent, data minimisation and a written safeguarding and stopping protocol.
- No engagement may be described as certification, efficacy evidence or institutional endorsement unless the commissioned method and reviewer explicitly support that claim.
Manual reviewer verification
A named accountable human records how a reviewer's identity and relevant credentials were checked without publishing sensitive identity material.
A valid receipt proves only record, hash and date consistency. It cannot prove identity, credentials, evidence authenticity, independence or professional judgement and must never trigger automatic release.
Download the blank verification receipt
Keep raw evidence, nonces, contact details and identity documents outside the public repository. Publish no completed receipt without a separate privacy review.
Three workstreams
Priority 1 · everyday-hero-quest
Scenario-level safeguarding, digital-safety and primary-education adjudication
Review unit: Every scenario prompt, response option, explanation and caregiver framing, identified by stable ID and content hash.
First pass: All 31 paused and two tier-3 not-queued scenarios first, followed by a risk-based pass over 51 active scenarios.
Required: Singapore primary educator; child-safeguarding professional; digital-safety specialist; accessibility or neurodiversity-informed reviewer; caregiver usability reviewer
Gate: No paused or tier-3 item returns to a child-facing queue until every required lens for that item records a hash-bound outcome.
Reviewer artifact: /data/everyday-hero/scenario-register.json
Blank return: /data/everyday-hero/review-return-template.json
Priority 2 · foxys-learning-patch
Activity-level early-years, speech-language, multilingual and accessibility review
Review unit: Every guided activity, prompt, feedback string, audio or visual cue, caregiver note and off-screen mission.
First pass: Three Minutes Together and every Mandarin or Malay vocabulary and feedback path, then the full activity inventory.
Required: early-childhood educator with experience around ages 18 months to 3 years; speech-language professional; native Singapore Mandarin or Simplified-Chinese reviewer; native Singapore Malay reviewer; accessibility tester covering keyboard, screen reader, reduced motion, sound-off and touch use
Gate: Do not make developmental, language-learning or accessibility-conformance claims until the relevant specialist has reviewed the exact artifact.
Reviewer artifact: /data/reviews/2026-08-25-foxy-specialist-review-packet-ced84410196c.json
Blank return: /data/reviews/2026-08-25-foxy-specialist-review-return-template-ced84410196c.json
Priority 3 · primary-power-quest-sg
Question-bank and generator validation for P1-P3 English, Mathematics, Chinese and Science
Review unit: A reproducible stratified sample plus all generator rules, answer keys, explanations and difficulty labels.
First pass: At least 30 reproducibly seeded items per level-subject cell, every template family, all edge cases and every claimed difficulty transition.
Required: Singapore P1-P3 English educator; Singapore P1-P3 Mathematics educator; Singapore P1-P3 Chinese educator; Singapore P1-P3 Science educator; accessibility and caregiver-usability reviewer
Gate: Do not claim curriculum alignment, assessment validity, readiness, mastery or calibrated difficulty from generator tests alone.
Reviewer artifact: /data/reviews/2026-08-25-primary-power-educator-review-packet-747c8ed9a447.json
Blank return: /data/reviews/2026-08-25-primary-power-educator-review-return-template-747c8ed9a447.json
Shared deliverables
- Item- or activity-level decision: approve for bounded practice, revise, or withhold.
- Reason for every revise or withhold decision, with an authoritative source or professional-practice basis where applicable.
- Exact replacement wording for high-priority defects when feasible.
- Reviewer name, role, relevant qualification or lived or professional expertise, organisation if any, review date, conflict disclosure and reviewed artifact hash.
- A short residual-risk note explaining what the review does not establish.
Optional follow-on study
Observed caregiver-child usability pilot
Start only after: The three expert content-review workstreams have closed critical defects.
Purpose: Observe comprehension, stopping behaviour, caregiver burden and accessibility barriers; not measure learning efficacy.
Minimum method: Small moderated sessions with a written protocol, informed adult consent, child assent where appropriate, no sensitive profiling, predefined stopping rules and a de-identified issue log.